vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Athene Holding Ltd. (ATHS) and Parker Hannifin (PH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Athene Holding Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.1B vs $6.2B, roughly 1.3× Parker Hannifin). Parker Hannifin runs the higher net margin — 14.6% vs 6.4%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Athene Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.1% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Athene Holding Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (19.2% CAGR vs 9.1%).
Athene Holding Ltd. is a leading US-focused retirement services provider. It offers fixed, indexed and variable annuity products plus tailored retirement savings solutions for individual consumers and institutional clients, aiming to help customers secure long-term financial stability for their retirement.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.
ATHS vs PH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1B | $6.2B |
| Net Profit | $523.0M | $904.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.4% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 115.1% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.5% | -5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $7.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $5.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $904.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $523.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $464.0M | $923.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0M | $961.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $948.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.0M | $698.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $629.0M | $785.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.3% | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 21.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | 15.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.06 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $476.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.8B | $6.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $20.5B | $14.6B |
| Total Assets | $442.2B | $30.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.38× | 0.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $476.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $427.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $473.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $467.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $408.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $395.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $371.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $422.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.5B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.4B | $13.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1B | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0B | $12.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $30.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $442.2B | $30.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.9B | $30.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $405.3B | $29.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.5B | $28.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.3B | $28.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $355.0B | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.6B | $29.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.38× | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.38× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | 0.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.39× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.33× | 0.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.38× | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0B | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.82× | 2.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $862.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $636.0M | $782.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.0M | $630.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $386.0M | $934.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.0M | $744.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $525.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $768.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $693.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $542.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $813.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.91× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.28× | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 0.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATHS
Segment breakdown not available.
PH
| Diversified Industrial | $3.7B | 60% |
| Aerospace Systems | $1.8B | 29% |
| Other | $685.0M | 11% |
