vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMES NATIONAL CORP (ATLO) and Hub Cyber Security Ltd. (HUBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMES NATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.7M vs $13.9M, roughly 1.3× Hub Cyber Security Ltd.). AMES NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -91.4%, a 126.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Ames National Corp is a U.S. financial holding company based in Iowa. It operates multiple community banking subsidiaries, offering retail and commercial financial services including deposit accounts, personal and business loans, mortgages, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs across central Iowa.
The Hub Power Company Limited, colloquially known as HUBCO, is a Pakistani power company based in Karachi, Sindh. It was the first independent power producer (IPP) established in Pakistan, and before the termination of its energy agreement in October 2024, it was the largest IPP in the country. HUBCO is listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange.
ATLO vs HUBC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.7M | $13.9M |
| Net Profit | $6.5M | $-12.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 44.3% | -80.8% |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -91.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 85.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | -80.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | -95.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | -91.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | -167.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $126.8M | $3.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $207.9M | $-80.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $27.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $126.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $163.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $111.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $207.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $200.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.7M | $-80.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $167.1M | $-59.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $165.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $21.3M | $-6.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $20.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 110.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.28× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | 110.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 94.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.28× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
