vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($489.5M vs $446.6M, roughly 1.1× Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs 8.0%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.8% vs 9.8%). e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($52.8M vs $31.2M).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. is an American cosmetics brand based in Oakland, California. It was founded by Joseph Shamah and Scott Vincent Borba in 2004. The company sells items include bath and skin-care products, mineral-based makeup, professional tools, eyeliners, lipstick, glosses, blushes, bronzers, brushes and mascara. Its products are sold in 18 countries and in several stores including Target, Kmart, Dollar General and Walmart. Over half the company's sales come from its website, which is als...
ATMU vs ELF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $489.5M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $39.4M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 13.8% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | 8.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | 37.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | 128.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $0.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $489.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $343.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $353.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 71.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 69.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 69.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $196.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | $816.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $196.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $194.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $170.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | $816.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | $831.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | $256.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $804.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $59.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $52.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 10.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $59.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $52.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | 7.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
ELF
Segment breakdown not available.
