vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (LOPE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $308.1M, roughly 1.4× Grand Canyon Education, Inc.). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs 10.7%, a 17.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 5.3%). Grand Canyon Education, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.9M vs $31.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Grand Canyon Education, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Grand Canyon Education, Inc. (GCE) is an American for-profit corporation that provides services to universities, specializing in program development, online education, and operational support. Formerly affiliated with Grand Canyon University (GCU), a Christian university in Arizona, GCE became a separate publicly traded company in 2008.
ATMU vs LOPE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $308.1M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $86.7M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 35.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | 28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | 5.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $3.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $308.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $261.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $247.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $289.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $292.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | $274.7M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $41.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $71.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $81.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $68.0M |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 30.8% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $3.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $2.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $2.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $1.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | $2.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $746.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $992.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $97.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $192.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $144.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $324.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $263.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $241.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | $196.2M |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $746.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $758.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $778.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $780.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $783.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $764.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $759.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $759.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $992.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $992.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $992.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $130.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $122.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | 39.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | 1.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $238.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $130.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $-48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $67.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $135.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $-29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $85.0M |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $122.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $-58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $58.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $126.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $-39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | $76.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 39.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | -22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | -2.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 2.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 0.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | -0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
LOPE
Segment breakdown not available.
