vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and PRA GROUP INC (PRAA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $333.4M, roughly 1.3× PRA GROUP INC). PRA GROUP INC runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 10.7%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PRA GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.7% vs 9.8%). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.2M vs $-90.4M). Over the past eight quarters, PRA GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (14.2% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
PRA Group, Inc. is a publicly traded debt buyer and debt collection company based in Norfolk, Virginia. The company buys delinquent consumer debt from credit card issuers and other financial institutions at a discount and pursues collection of the full debt owed. Founded in 1996, PRA Group employs more than 3200 people in 18 countries.
ATMU vs PRAA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $333.4M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $56.5M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 37.7% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | 206.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $1.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $333.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $311.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $287.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $293.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $281.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | $284.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.6M | $255.6M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $-407.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $42.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.5M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | -101.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 26.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | -131.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $1.47 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $-10.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $0.47 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.54 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $104.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | $979.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $107.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $131.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $105.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $141.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $149.2M | $108.1M |
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $600.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | $979.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $928.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.8M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | $-85.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | $-90.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | -27.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | -1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | $-169.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $-94.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.2M | $-73.0M |
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | $-90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $-98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-18.8M | $-73.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | -33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | -12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.4% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | -1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | -0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | -14.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | -5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | -1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | -1.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.18× | -21.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
PRAA
| GB | $170.1M | 51% |
| Other | $163.3M | 49% |