vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($446.6M vs $250.2M, roughly 1.8× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.7% vs 3.0%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs -3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. designs, manufactures and distributes high-performance filtration products and tailored solutions. Its portfolio covers air, fuel, oil and hydraulic filtration systems, serving global automotive, heavy-duty vehicle, industrial equipment and aerospace end markets, for both original equipment manufacturers and aftermarket replacement customers.
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
ATMU vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $446.6M | $250.2M |
| Net Profit | $48.0M | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | 28.5% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.8% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 19.7% | -20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $250.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $446.6M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $447.7M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.5M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.5M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $406.7M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $403.7M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $432.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.8M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.5% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.9% | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.66 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.49 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.52 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.4M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $570.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $378.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $739.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $236.4M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.3M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $190.8M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $183.3M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.3M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $570.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $577.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $588.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $592.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $596.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $600.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $378.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.7M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.3M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.3M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $227.4M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $221.2M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $178.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $739.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.37× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $47.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $31.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $148.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.7M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.9M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.74× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.64× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.61× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATMU
| Fuel Products | $219.1M | 49% |
| Lube | $84.8M | 19% |
| Air | $74.0M | 17% |
| Other | $68.7M | 15% |
| Related Party | $14.9M | 3% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.
