vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Atmos Energy (ATO) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Atmos Energy is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× Virtu Financial, Inc.). Virtu Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs 30.0%, a 1.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Virtu Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.7% vs 14.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Virtu Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.7% CAGR vs -9.7%).

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors, serving about three million natural gas distribution customers in over 1,400 communities in nine states from the Blue Ridge Mountains in the East to the Rocky Mountains in the West.

Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.

ATO vs VIRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ATO
ATO
1.2× larger
ATO
$1.3B
$1.1B
VIRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VIRT
VIRT
+16.6% gap
VIRT
30.7%
14.2%
ATO
Higher net margin
VIRT
VIRT
1.6% more per $
VIRT
31.6%
30.0%
ATO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VIRT
VIRT
Annualised
VIRT
25.7%
-9.7%
ATO

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Revenue
$1.3B
$1.1B
Net Profit
$403.0M
$346.6M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
38.3%
37.4%
Net Margin
30.0%
31.6%
Revenue YoY
14.2%
30.7%
Net Profit YoY
14.5%
82.8%
EPS (diluted)
$2.44
$1.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.3B
$969.9M
Q3 25
$737.5M
$824.8M
Q2 25
$838.8M
$999.6M
Q1 25
$2.0B
$837.9M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$834.3M
Q3 24
$657.9M
$706.8M
Q2 24
$701.5M
$693.0M
Net Profit
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$346.6M
Q4 25
$403.0M
$139.9M
Q3 25
$174.9M
$77.6M
Q2 25
$186.4M
$151.2M
Q1 25
$485.6M
$99.7M
Q4 24
$351.9M
$94.1M
Q3 24
$134.0M
$60.0M
Q2 24
$165.6M
$66.6M
Gross Margin
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
60.0%
Q4 24
80.1%
Q3 24
Q2 24
Operating Margin
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
37.4%
Q4 25
38.3%
35.4%
Q3 25
29.8%
21.8%
Q2 25
30.1%
34.7%
Q1 25
32.2%
26.7%
Q4 24
39.1%
24.3%
Q3 24
28.1%
20.8%
Q2 24
31.4%
22.4%
Net Margin
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
31.6%
Q4 25
30.0%
14.4%
Q3 25
23.7%
9.4%
Q2 25
22.2%
15.1%
Q1 25
24.9%
11.9%
Q4 24
29.9%
11.3%
Q3 24
20.4%
8.5%
Q2 24
23.6%
9.6%
EPS (diluted)
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$1.99
Q4 25
$2.44
$1.54
Q3 25
$1.04
$0.86
Q2 25
$1.16
$1.65
Q1 25
$3.03
$1.08
Q4 24
$2.23
$1.03
Q3 24
$0.82
$0.64
Q2 24
$1.08
$0.71

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$367.0M
$973.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$9.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$14.3B
$2.2B
Total Assets
$29.8B
$25.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.67×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$973.2M
Q4 25
$367.0M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$202.7M
$707.9M
Q2 25
$709.4M
$752.1M
Q1 25
$543.5M
$723.6M
Q4 24
$584.5M
$872.5M
Q3 24
$307.3M
$701.4M
Q2 24
$674.6M
$684.8M
Total Debt
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$9.6B
$2.0B
Q3 25
$8.9B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$8.9B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$8.4B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$8.4B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$7.8B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$7.8B
$1.7B
Stockholders' Equity
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$2.2B
Q4 25
$14.3B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$13.6B
$1.5B
Q2 25
$13.4B
$1.4B
Q1 25
$13.1B
$1.3B
Q4 24
$12.8B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$12.2B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$12.2B
$1.2B
Total Assets
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
$25.1B
Q4 25
$29.8B
$20.2B
Q3 25
$28.2B
$21.3B
Q2 25
$27.7B
$19.3B
Q1 25
$27.0B
$17.5B
Q4 24
$26.5B
$15.4B
Q3 24
$25.2B
$14.4B
Q2 24
$24.9B
$13.9B
Debt / Equity
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.67×
1.29×
Q3 25
0.66×
1.40×
Q2 25
0.67×
1.24×
Q1 25
0.64×
1.33×
Q4 24
0.66×
1.39×
Q3 24
0.64×
1.41×
Q2 24
0.64×
1.41×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$308.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-725.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-54.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
77.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.76×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-1.6B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$308.1M
$518.4M
Q3 25
$348.1M
$-68.7M
Q2 25
$496.4M
$62.8M
Q1 25
$922.9M
$15.0M
Q4 24
$282.0M
$599.0M
Q3 24
$330.7M
$112.1M
Q2 24
$411.2M
$490.8M
Free Cash Flow
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-725.3M
$495.6M
Q3 25
$-615.5M
$-76.7M
Q2 25
$-370.6M
$57.6M
Q1 25
$83.3M
$9.2M
Q4 24
$-609.2M
$586.6M
Q3 24
$-477.3M
$106.2M
Q2 24
$-302.4M
$486.9M
FCF Margin
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
-54.0%
51.1%
Q3 25
-83.5%
-9.3%
Q2 25
-44.2%
5.8%
Q1 25
4.3%
1.1%
Q4 24
-51.8%
70.3%
Q3 24
-72.5%
15.0%
Q2 24
-43.1%
70.3%
Capex Intensity
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
77.0%
2.4%
Q3 25
130.7%
1.0%
Q2 25
103.4%
0.5%
Q1 25
43.0%
0.7%
Q4 24
75.8%
1.5%
Q3 24
122.8%
0.8%
Q2 24
101.7%
0.6%
Cash Conversion
ATO
ATO
VIRT
VIRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.76×
3.71×
Q3 25
1.99×
-0.89×
Q2 25
2.66×
0.42×
Q1 25
1.90×
0.15×
Q4 24
0.80×
6.37×
Q3 24
2.47×
1.87×
Q2 24
2.48×
7.37×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ATO
ATO

Distribution Segment$1.3B94%
Transportation Revenue$41.5M3%
Other$39.4M3%
Miscellaneous Revenue$2.8M0%

VIRT
VIRT

Trading income, net$789.1M72%
Commissions, net and technology services$186.6M17%
Other$119.6M11%

Related Comparisons