vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agape ATP Corp (ATPC) and Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agape ATP Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($399.1K vs $272.0K, roughly 1.5× Bakkt Holdings, Inc.). On growth, Agape ATP Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.9% vs -100.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Agape ATP Corp's revenue compounded faster (11.9% CAGR vs -98.2%).
Bakkt Holdings, Inc., headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia and New York City, provides a software as a service (SaaS) and API platform for owning and trading cryptocurrency. Bakkt was founded, and is 55% owned, by Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which also owns the New York Stock Exchange. Bakkt earns revenue from commissions for payments and purchases and sales of cryptocurrency.
ATPC vs BKKT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $399.1K | $272.0K |
| Net Profit | $-376.9K | — |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -325.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -94.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.9% | -100.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.4% | -344.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.76 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $399.1K | $272.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $370.6K | $-50.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $465.5K | $577.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $289.0K | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.8K | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.3K | $328.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $313.0K | $509.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.6K | $854.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-376.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-586.8K | $-14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-617.1K | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-698.9K | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-808.4K | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-509.6K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-442.7K | $-16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-709.7K | $-8.2M |
| Q4 25 | 58.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -325.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -162.3% | 50526.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -136.8% | -3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -249.2% | -1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -235.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -165.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -144.9% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -227.1% | -3.7% |
| Q4 25 | -94.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -158.3% | 29836.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -132.6% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -241.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -224.7% | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.8% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -141.4% | -3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -222.7% | -1.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | $-2.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.31 | $-2.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-2.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.18 | $-1.86 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $140.1K | $27.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.5M | $112.8M |
| Total Assets | $24.6M | $162.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $140.1K | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.7K | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.0K | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.8K | $23.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $56.6M |
| Q4 25 | $22.5M | $112.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $35.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0M | $44.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $57.0M |
| Q4 25 | $24.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $258.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $190.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.2M | $176.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $269.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-208.3K | $-153.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-208.3K | $-153.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-256.7K | $-46.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-494.5K | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-101.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-645.3K | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-424.9K | $-25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-412.5K | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-101.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-66.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -13.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
