vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agape ATP Corp (ATPC) and HWH International Inc. (HWH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agape ATP Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($399.1K vs $206.8K, roughly 1.9× HWH International Inc.). Agape ATP Corp runs the higher net margin — -94.4% vs -140.7%, a 46.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agape ATP Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.9% vs -40.2%).
HWH International Inc operates in the global luxury hospitality and lifestyle services industry, providing premium travel membership programs, curated high-end travel experiences, and exclusive access to luxury resorts, fine dining venues, and premium leisure facilities. Its key markets include North America, Asia Pacific, and Europe, serving high-net-worth individuals and corporate clients.
ATPC vs HWH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $399.1K | $206.8K |
| Net Profit | $-376.9K | $-291.0K |
| Gross Margin | 58.6% | 59.8% |
| Operating Margin | -325.2% | -142.7% |
| Net Margin | -94.4% | -140.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.9% | -40.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.4% | 46.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.76 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $399.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $370.6K | $206.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $465.5K | $310.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $289.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.8K | $287.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.3K | $345.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $313.0K | $334.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $318.6K | $286.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-376.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-586.8K | $-291.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-617.1K | $83.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-698.9K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-808.4K | $-476.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-509.6K | $-548.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-442.7K | $-387.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-709.7K | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | 58.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.5% | 59.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.5% | 39.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.6% | 46.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 61.8% | 49.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.8% | 57.1% |
| Q4 25 | -325.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -162.3% | -142.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -136.8% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -249.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -235.7% | -170.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -165.4% | -155.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -144.9% | -120.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -227.1% | -467.1% |
| Q4 25 | -94.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -158.3% | -140.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -132.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -241.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -224.7% | -166.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -153.8% | -158.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -141.4% | -115.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -222.7% | -467.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.31 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.18 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $140.1K | $2.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $22.5M | $2.8M |
| Total Assets | $24.6M | $5.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $140.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.7K | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $216.0K | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.8K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $836.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $958.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $-374.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.4M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $2.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-208.3K | $-199.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-217.9K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -105.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-208.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-256.7K | $-199.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-494.5K | $26.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-645.3K | $-415.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-424.9K | $-275.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-412.5K | $-490.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $-638.2K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-217.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-415.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-277.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-516.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-640.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -105.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -144.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -80.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -154.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -223.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
