vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APTARGROUP, INC. (ATR) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APTARGROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($982.9M vs $919.1M, roughly 1.1× EnerSys). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs 7.4%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, APTARGROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs 1.4%). EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $53.3M). Over the past eight quarters, APTARGROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs 0.5%).
AptarGroup, Inc., also known as Aptar, is a United States–based global manufacturer of consumer dispensing packaging and drug delivery devices. The group has manufacturing operations in 18 countries.
EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.
ATR vs ENS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $982.9M | $919.1M |
| Net Profit | $72.8M | $90.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 13.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | 9.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | 1.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | -21.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | $2.40 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $982.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $962.7M | $919.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $961.1M | $951.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.0M | $893.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $887.3M | $974.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $848.1M | $906.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $909.3M | $883.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.1M | $852.9M |
| Q1 26 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.3M | $90.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.9M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | $114.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $82.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $70.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $2.40 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.92 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.67 | $1.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.17 | $2.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.48 | $2.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $2.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | $1.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $229.5M | $450.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $229.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $409.5M | $450.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.8M | $388.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.8M | $346.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $343.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.2M | $463.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.9M | $407.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.9M | $344.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $822.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $184.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $53.3M | $171.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | 18.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $327.0M | $441.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $184.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.6M | $218.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.0M | $968.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $135.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.2M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.3M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.6M | $10.4M |
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.9M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | $197.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.5M | $-32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.9M | $104.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | -3.0% |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.47× | 2.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | 0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 0.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATR
Segment breakdown not available.
ENS
| Energy Systems | $399.5M | 43% |
| Motive Power | $352.0M | 38% |
| Services | $92.6M | 10% |
| Transferred Over Time | $38.2M | 4% |
| Other | $36.8M | 4% |
