vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APTARGROUP, INC. (ATR) and SM Energy Co (SM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APTARGROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($982.9M vs $704.9M, roughly 1.4× SM Energy Co). On growth, APTARGROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.8% vs -17.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SM Energy Co's revenue compounded faster (12.2% CAGR vs 3.9%).
AptarGroup, Inc., also known as Aptar, is a United States–based global manufacturer of consumer dispensing packaging and drug delivery devices. The group has manufacturing operations in 18 countries.
SM Energy Company is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Denver, Colorado.
ATR vs SM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $982.9M | $704.9M |
| Net Profit | $72.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.9% | 25.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.8% | -17.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $982.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $962.7M | $704.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $961.1M | $811.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $966.0M | $792.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $887.3M | $844.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $848.1M | $852.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $909.3M | $643.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $910.1M | $634.6M |
| Q1 26 | $72.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.9M | $155.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.7M | $201.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.8M | $182.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.0M | $240.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $210.3M |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.2% | 33.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 51.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 44.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.12 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.13 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.92 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.67 | $1.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.17 | $1.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.48 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $2.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.34 | $1.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $229.5M | $368.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $4.8B |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $9.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $229.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $409.5M | $368.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.8M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $169.8M | $101.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.8M | $54.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $327.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.9M | $487.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $546.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $535.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $561.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $822.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $6.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $451.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $53.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $327.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $451.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.6M | $505.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.0M | $571.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.7M | $483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.2M | $578.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.3M | $452.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.6M | $476.4M |
| Q1 26 | $53.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.39× | 3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | 2.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 2.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
