vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN) and Avidbank Holdings, Inc. (AVBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC runs the higher net margin — 1053.8% vs 62.0%, a 991.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
Avidbank Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based financial holding company operating through its subsidiary AvidBank. It offers commercial banking products and services primarily to small and medium-sized enterprises, business owners, and high-net-worth individuals across California, including commercial loans, deposit accounts, cash management, and customized financing solutions for sectors like manufacturing, technology, real estate and professional services.
AUBN vs AVBH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $158.0K | $-60.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $-37.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 1053.8% | 62.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-4.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $158.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.0K | $-60.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.0K | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $156.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1053.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1446.1% | 62.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1205.9% | 376.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 987.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1033.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1124.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1133.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 878.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | $-4.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $92.1M | $273.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $92.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $273.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $204.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $990.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.5M | $12.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -20.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.10× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 690.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | 1.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
