vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $8.5M, roughly 1.6× AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -13.2%, a 32.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs 8.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
AUBN vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.5M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.7% | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $92.1M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $92.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.5M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.8M | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.3M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $990.1M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.0M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 128.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 128.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUBN
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
