vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $8.5M, roughly 1.7× AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 19.7%, a 17.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.4% vs -1.5%). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.9M vs $-3.6M).
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
AUBN vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.5M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.7% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $92.1M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $92.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $990.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.9M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 128.3% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.5% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.42× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 128.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
