vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN) and SS Innovations International, Inc. (SSII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5M vs $8.5M, roughly 1.7× AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC runs the higher net margin — 19.7% vs -17.0%, a 36.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS Innovations International, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs 8.4%). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.9M vs $-3.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SS Innovations International, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.9% CAGR vs 5.9%).
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is a global medical technology enterprise specializing in the research, development and manufacturing of innovative surgical robotic systems. It provides high-precision, accessible robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery, catering to healthcare facilities across multiple regions to boost surgical outcomes and cut procedural burdens.
AUBN vs SSII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.5M | $14.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | -17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | 79.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.7% | -28.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-256.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | -14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | -115.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | -22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | -90.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | -270.3% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | -111.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | -23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | -91.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | -270.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $92.1M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $74.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $466.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $220.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $608.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $948.1K |
| Q4 25 | $92.1M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.5M | $16.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $74.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.8M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.3M | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $990.1M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.0M | $35.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.9M | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 128.3% | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.5% | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-22.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.8M |
| Q4 25 | 128.3% | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -64.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -136.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.6% | -41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -96.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -76.9% |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 7.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUBN
Segment breakdown not available.
SSII
| System Sales | $13.4M | 92% |
| Other | $1.2M | 8% |
