vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5M vs $8.5M, roughly 1.4× AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs 8.4%). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.9M vs $589.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC's revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
AUBN vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.5M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $92.1M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $92.1M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.5M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.8M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.3M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $990.1M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.0M | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.9M | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 128.3% | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.5% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 128.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.6% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
