vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) and Laser Photonics Corp (LASE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aurora Innovation, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0M vs $919.3K, roughly 1.1× Laser Photonics Corp). Laser Photonics Corp runs the higher net margin — -506.4% vs -20100.0%, a 19593.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Laser Photonics Corp's revenue compounded faster (-3.9% CAGR vs -41.2%).
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
IPG Photonics Corporation is a manufacturer of fiber lasers. IPG Photonics developed and commercialized optical fiber lasers, which are used in a variety of applications including materials processing, medical applications and telecommunications. IPG has manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Russia and Italy.
AUR vs LASE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $919.3K |
| Net Profit | $-201.0M | $-4.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | -20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -22200.0% | -350.0% |
| Net Margin | -20100.0% | -506.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -186.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $919.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $716.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $623.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $743.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $994.6K |
| Q3 25 | $-201.0M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-201.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $586.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-208.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-182.0M | $-934.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-545.7K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-486.6K |
| Q3 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 85.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 84.5% |
| Q3 25 | -22200.0% | -350.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23000.0% | -37.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -255.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -238.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -149.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -73.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -88.4% |
| Q3 25 | -20100.0% | -506.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20100.0% | -68.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -226.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -149.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -73.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -48.9% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.0M | $3.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $4.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $17.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.0M | $78.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $533.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $6.2M |
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $13.9M |
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $17.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $14.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $15.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-149.0M | $763.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15700.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 800.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-645.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-149.0M | $763.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.0M | $632.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-176.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-866.3K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q3 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-150.0M | $589.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -15700.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15100.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -388.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -136.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 800.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 700.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -11.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
