vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) and Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. (LCCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aurora Innovation, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0M vs $717.3K, roughly 1.4× Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp.). Lakeshore Acquisition III Corp. runs the higher net margin — 67.9% vs -20100.0%, a 20167.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
AUR vs LCCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $717.3K |
| Net Profit | $-201.0M | $486.8K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -22200.0% | -32.1% |
| Net Margin | -20100.0% | 67.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $717.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $467.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-201.0M | $486.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-201.0M | $216.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-208.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-182.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-218.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-196.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-198.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -22200.0% | -32.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23000.0% | -53.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -6903.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -20100.0% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20100.0% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -6834.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $-1.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $71.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $785.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $966.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $1.2B | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.0B | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $70.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-149.0M | $-206.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15700.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 800.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-645.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-149.0M | $-206.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.0M | $-218.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-176.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-182.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-136.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-508.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-142.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-150.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-186.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-138.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-523.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-145.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -15700.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15100.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -24869.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -5005.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | 800.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 700.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 713.3% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 103.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
