vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) and OSR Holdings, Inc. (OSRH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aurora Innovation, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0M vs $627.7K, roughly 1.6× OSR Holdings, Inc.). OSR Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -508.9% vs -20100.0%, a 19591.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
AUR vs OSRH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $627.7K |
| Net Profit | $-201.0M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -22200.0% | -605.9% |
| Net Margin | -20100.0% | -508.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -1283.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $627.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $761.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $823.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $881.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $910.2K | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $0 | — |
| Q3 25 | $-201.0M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-201.0M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-208.0M | $-231.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-182.0M | $-97.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-60.4K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-218.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-196.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -22200.0% | -605.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23000.0% | -460.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -383.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -433.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -364.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -362.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -20100.0% | -508.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20100.0% | -460.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1496.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.0M | $2.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $134.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $177.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | $12.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $119.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6K | ||
| Q2 23 | $785.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $966.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $134.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $139.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.6B | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $177.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $185.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.9B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-149.0M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15700.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 800.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-645.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-149.0M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.0M | $-482.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-64.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.0M | $-686.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-176.0M | $-483.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-498.8K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-182.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-136.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-150.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-186.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-138.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -15700.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15100.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 800.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 700.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
