vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OSR Holdings, Inc. (OSRH) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OSR Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($627.7K vs $290.0K, roughly 2.2× Sintx Technologies, Inc.). OSR Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -508.9% vs -763.8%, a 254.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OSR Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-23.7% vs -46.5%).
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
OSRH vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $627.7K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-3.2M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 41.7% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -605.9% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -508.9% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.7% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1283.3% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $627.7K | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $761.3K | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $823.0K | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $881.8K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $910.2K | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-231.0K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.3K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-60.4K | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.8% | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.3% | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.3% | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -605.9% | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -460.5% | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -383.3% | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -433.4% | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -364.0% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -362.8% | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -508.9% | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -460.2% | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1496.5% | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.1% | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.6% | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.12 | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.2M | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $134.2M | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $177.3M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.2K | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.1K | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6K | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.3M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.8M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.3M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.6M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.3M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.7M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-482.6K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.1K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-686.5K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-483.2K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-498.8K | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
