vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) and OPEN TEXT CORP (OTEX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OPEN TEXT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.0M, roughly 1326.7× Aurora Innovation, Inc.). OPEN TEXT CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.7% vs -20100.0%, a 20112.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. OPEN TEXT CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($279.4M vs $-157.0M). Over the past eight quarters, OPEN TEXT CORP's revenue compounded faster (-4.3% CAGR vs -41.2%).
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
Open Text Corporation is a global software company that develops and sells information management software.
AUR vs OTEX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $-201.0M | $168.1M |
| Gross Margin | -500.0% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | -22200.0% | 22.0% |
| Net Margin | -20100.0% | 12.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -26.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $168.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-201.0M | $146.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-201.0M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $229.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-208.0M | $84.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-182.0M | $248.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $98.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -500.0% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -400.0% | 72.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 73.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 73.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22200.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23000.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20100.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20100.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.0M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $4.0B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $13.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $13.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-149.0M | $318.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.0M | $279.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15700.0% | 21.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 800.0% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-645.0M | $878.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-149.0M | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.0M | $158.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $402.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $348.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.0M | $-77.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-176.0M | $185.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $384.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $279.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-157.0M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $373.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $306.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-150.0M | $-117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0M | $145.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $348.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -15700.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15100.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 800.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 700.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUR
Segment breakdown not available.
OTEX
| Transferred At Point In Time | $184.2M | 14% |
| Cybersecurity Enterprise Product | $174.5M | 13% |
| Business Network Product | $159.8M | 12% |
| Business Network Cloud Services And Subscriptions | $151.4M | 11% |
| Content Cloud Services And Subscriptions | $137.9M | 10% |
| Cybersecurity SMB Consumer Product | $127.6M | 10% |
| Application Delivery Management Product | $120.1M | 9% |
| IT Operations Management Product | $113.3M | 9% |
| Professional Service And Other | $82.5M | 6% |
| Analytics Product | $58.1M | 4% |
| IT Operations Management Cloud Services And Subscriptions | $7.8M | 1% |
