vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. (ITP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $21.2M, roughly 1.2× Autolus Therapeutics plc). IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. runs the higher net margin — -5.7% vs -373.3%, a 367.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.5M vs $-72.3M).
Autolus Therapeutics plc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in the development of next-generation engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. It operates in the global oncology biotech market, advancing a pipeline of targeted immunotherapy candidates across multiple clinical development stages.
IT TECH PACKAGING, INC. is a paper manufacturing enterprise primarily operating in China. It produces and distributes a diverse portfolio of paper products including corrugated packaging paper, boxboard, and printing-use cultural paper, serving sectors such as consumer goods packaging, logistics, and commercial printing across its core market.
AUTL vs ITP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.2M | $25.6M |
| Net Profit | $-79.1M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -337.9% | -3.9% |
| Net Margin | -373.3% | -5.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 26.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $21.0M |
| Q3 25 | $-79.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.9M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-70.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.3M | $-77.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.7M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.2% |
| Q3 25 | -337.9% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -292.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -726.3% | -31.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -384.1% | -51.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -18.1% |
| Q3 25 | -373.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -229.0% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -781.1% | -32.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -522.1% | -54.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -19.0% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.31 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.5M | $152.0M |
| Total Assets | $661.9M | $175.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.03× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $86.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $657.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $705.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $758.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $11.4M |
| Q3 25 | $265.5M | $152.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.5M | $152.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $152.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $156.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.0M | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.8M | $163.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $582.0M | $164.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $168.3M |
| Q3 25 | $661.9M | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $721.0M | $175.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $746.3M | $175.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.5M | $190.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.6M | $191.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.4M | $177.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $194.7M |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.07× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-67.9M | $1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-72.3M | $1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -341.2% | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.8% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-322.5M | $3.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-67.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.8M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-75.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-76.7M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.1M | $721.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.5M | $624.4K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $5.4M |
| Q3 25 | $-72.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-80.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.8M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.9M | $668.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.0M | $615.4K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-7.7M |
| Q3 25 | -341.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -382.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -933.1% | -22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -406.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -36.7% |
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 62.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
