vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. (WOR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.5M vs $319.0M, roughly 1.0× Mission Produce, Inc.). WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 8.3% vs 5.0%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs -10.0%). Mission Produce, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.6M vs $39.1M).

Produce Co., Ltd. was a Japanese video game company. Founded on April 6, 1990 by former Irem employees, it developed a number of games for both Enix and Hudson Soft. Produce! have created games for arcades and for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo 64, PlayStation, and PC Engine systems.

Worthington Enterprises, Inc. is an American industrial manufacturing company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. The company is composed of two business segments, consumer products and building products. Within these segments, the company designs and manufactures pressure vessels such as propane, oxygen and helium tanks, refrigerant and industrial cylinders, camping and residential use cylinders, water system tanks for storage, treatment, heating, expansion and flow control, as well as a variet...

AVO vs WOR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WOR
WOR
1.0× larger
WOR
$327.5M
$319.0M
AVO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WOR
WOR
+29.5% gap
WOR
19.5%
-10.0%
AVO
Higher net margin
WOR
WOR
3.3% more per $
WOR
8.3%
5.0%
AVO
More free cash flow
AVO
AVO
$16.5M more FCF
AVO
$55.6M
$39.1M
WOR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Revenue
$319.0M
$327.5M
Net Profit
$16.0M
$27.3M
Gross Margin
17.5%
25.8%
Operating Margin
8.8%
3.7%
Net Margin
5.0%
8.3%
Revenue YoY
-10.0%
19.5%
Net Profit YoY
-7.5%
-3.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.23
$0.55

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$319.0M
$327.5M
Q3 25
$357.7M
$303.7M
Q2 25
$380.3M
Q1 25
$334.2M
Q4 24
$354.4M
Q3 24
$324.0M
Q2 24
$297.6M
Q1 24
$258.7M
Net Profit
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$16.0M
$27.3M
Q3 25
$14.7M
$35.1M
Q2 25
$3.1M
Q1 25
$3.9M
Q4 24
$17.3M
Q3 24
$12.4M
Q2 24
$7.0M
Q1 24
$0
Gross Margin
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
17.5%
25.8%
Q3 25
12.6%
27.1%
Q2 25
7.5%
Q1 25
9.4%
Q4 24
15.7%
Q3 24
11.4%
Q2 24
10.4%
Q1 24
11.1%
Operating Margin
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
8.8%
3.7%
Q3 25
5.9%
3.0%
Q2 25
1.8%
Q1 25
2.8%
Q4 24
8.1%
Q3 24
5.2%
Q2 24
4.1%
Q1 24
3.1%
Net Margin
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
5.0%
8.3%
Q3 25
4.1%
11.6%
Q2 25
0.8%
Q1 25
1.2%
Q4 24
4.9%
Q3 24
3.8%
Q2 24
2.4%
Q1 24
EPS (diluted)
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$0.23
$0.55
Q3 25
$0.21
$0.70
Q2 25
$0.04
Q1 25
$0.05
Q4 24
$0.25
Q3 24
$0.17
Q2 24
$0.10
Q1 24
$0.00

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$64.8M
$180.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$95.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$587.3M
$962.6M
Total Assets
$983.0M
$1.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.16×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$64.8M
$180.3M
Q3 25
$43.7M
$167.1M
Q2 25
$36.7M
Q1 25
$40.1M
Q4 24
$58.0M
Q3 24
$49.5M
Q2 24
$46.2M
Q1 24
$39.9M
Total Debt
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$95.8M
Q3 25
$131.5M
Q2 25
$147.2M
Q1 25
$117.9M
Q4 24
$113.7M
Q3 24
$134.4M
Q2 24
$170.2M
Q1 24
$156.1M
Stockholders' Equity
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$587.3M
$962.6M
Q3 25
$568.7M
$959.1M
Q2 25
$552.3M
Q1 25
$550.8M
Q4 24
$547.3M
Q3 24
$527.3M
Q2 24
$513.3M
Q1 24
$505.1M
Total Assets
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$983.0M
$1.8B
Q3 25
$1.0B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$1.0B
Q1 25
$997.8M
Q4 24
$971.5M
Q3 24
$959.9M
Q2 24
$966.9M
Q1 24
$937.5M
Debt / Equity
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
0.16×
Q3 25
0.23×
Q2 25
0.27×
Q1 25
0.21×
Q4 24
0.21×
Q3 24
0.25×
Q2 24
0.33×
Q1 24
0.31×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$67.2M
$51.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$55.6M
$39.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
17.4%
11.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.6%
3.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.20×
1.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$37.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$67.2M
$51.5M
Q3 25
$34.4M
$41.1M
Q2 25
$-11.8M
Q1 25
$-1.2M
Q4 24
$38.0M
Q3 24
$42.5M
Q2 24
$3.4M
Q1 24
$9.5M
Free Cash Flow
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
$55.6M
$39.1M
Q3 25
$22.6M
$27.9M
Q2 25
$-25.0M
Q1 25
$-16.0M
Q4 24
$31.1M
Q3 24
$34.9M
Q2 24
$-4.4M
Q1 24
$-400.0K
FCF Margin
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
17.4%
11.9%
Q3 25
6.3%
9.2%
Q2 25
-6.6%
Q1 25
-4.8%
Q4 24
8.8%
Q3 24
10.8%
Q2 24
-1.5%
Q1 24
-0.2%
Capex Intensity
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
3.6%
3.8%
Q3 25
3.3%
4.3%
Q2 25
3.5%
Q1 25
4.4%
Q4 24
1.9%
Q3 24
2.3%
Q2 24
2.6%
Q1 24
3.8%
Cash Conversion
AVO
AVO
WOR
WOR
Q4 25
4.20×
1.89×
Q3 25
2.34×
1.17×
Q2 25
-3.81×
Q1 25
-0.31×
Q4 24
2.20×
Q3 24
3.43×
Q2 24
0.49×
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AVO
AVO

Avocado$256.9M81%
Blueberry$36.5M11%
Mango$18.7M6%
Other$6.9M2%

WOR
WOR

Building Products$207.5M63%
Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Other$120.7M37%

Related Comparisons