vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Solowin Holdings, Ltd. (AXG) and DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp (DTSQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($452.4K vs $410.0K, roughly 1.1× Solowin Holdings, Ltd.).
DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp is a special purpose acquisition company dedicated to pursuing business combinations with high-growth enterprises operating in cloud technology, enterprise software and digital services sectors, primarily targeting innovative players across the Asia-Pacific region.
AXG vs DTSQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $410.0K | $452.4K |
| Net Profit | — | $288.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -34.1% | -36.4% |
| Net Margin | — | 63.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $452.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $751.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $742.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $737.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $288.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $583.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $631.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $630.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -34.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 63.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 85.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 85.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5M | $461 |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0M | $-1.1M |
| Total Assets | $13.1M | $18.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $461 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $126.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $271.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-736.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-568.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-457.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $71.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $-411.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -392.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.43× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-411.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-105.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-145.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-139.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -392.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.22× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
