vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp (DTSQ) and Innventure, Inc. (INV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Innventure, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($822.0K vs $452.4K, roughly 1.8× DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp). DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp runs the higher net margin — 63.7% vs -4593.8%, a 4657.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
DT Cloud Star Acquisition Corp is a special purpose acquisition company dedicated to pursuing business combinations with high-growth enterprises operating in cloud technology, enterprise software and digital services sectors, primarily targeting innovative players across the Asia-Pacific region.
Innventure, Inc. is a business development and commercialization firm that partners with large global corporations to turn their underutilized intellectual property and unused R&D innovations into scalable, high-growth independent businesses. It focuses on sectors including sustainability, advanced materials and life sciences, serving primarily North American and European markets.
DTSQ vs INV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $452.4K | $822.0K |
| Net Profit | $288.0K | $-37.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | -1315.8% |
| Operating Margin | -36.4% | -3859.1% |
| Net Margin | 63.7% | -4593.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $452.4K | $822.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.5K | $534.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $742.2K | $476.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.7K | $224.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $317.0K |
| Q4 25 | $288.0K | $-37.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $583.0K | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $631.5K | $-84.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $630.3K | $-143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1315.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -676.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -501.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -145.1% |
| Q4 25 | -36.4% | -3859.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.5% | -5469.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -29952.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.0% | -116606.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4313.6% |
| Q4 25 | 63.7% | -4593.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 77.6% | -5305.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 85.1% | -17694.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.4% | -63837.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -697.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $461 | $60.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-1.1M | $204.2M |
| Total Assets | $18.0M | $599.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $461 | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1K | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.1K | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1M | $204.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-736.8K | $190.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-568.4K | $218.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-457.7K | $261.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-22.3M |
| Q4 25 | $18.0M | $599.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.7M | $556.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.1M | $556.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.6M | $660.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-19.7K | $-24.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-24.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2968.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-82.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-19.7K | $-24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.9K | $-19.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-145.5K | $-22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-139.9K | $-14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2968.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3747.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4637.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6970.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 82.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 409.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
