vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Solowin Holdings, Ltd. (AXG) and Future Vision II Acquisition Corp. (FVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($584.4K vs $410.0K, roughly 1.4× Solowin Holdings, Ltd.).
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp is a special purpose acquisition company formed to pursue mergers, asset acquisitions, or business combinations with high-growth enterprises. It targets technology, consumer, and sustainable industry segments across North American and Asia-Pacific markets to drive long-term shareholder value.
AXG vs FVN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $410.0K | $584.4K |
| Net Profit | — | $507.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -34.1% | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | — | 86.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $584.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $618.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $614.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $612.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.0K | $147.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | $507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $557.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $551.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $454.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.9K |
| Q4 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -34.1% | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 86.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 90.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 96.0% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5M | $61.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0M | $1.8M |
| Total Assets | $13.1M | $62.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $62.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.1M | $59.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $-99.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -392.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-99.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-190.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -392.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
