vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axil Brands, Inc. (AXIL) and Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Axil Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.1M vs $7.3M, roughly 1.1× Coda Octopus Group, Inc.). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.1% vs 8.7%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (43.8% vs 5.2%). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $906.4K). Over the past eight quarters, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.7% CAGR vs 12.1%).
Axil Brands, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered company that designs, manufactures and markets premium hearing protection products, audio enhancement devices and personal audio accessories. Its offerings include custom-fit earplugs, Bluetooth-enabled hearing buds for work, sports and leisure use, serving both consumer and professional segments across global markets.
CODA plc was a mid-sized international financial software company based in the United Kingdom. Founded in 1979, it was purchased in 2008 by Unit4, a supplier of enterprise software, based in the Netherlands. CODA creates, markets and implements a range of business software systems designed for finance directors and finance departments. These include:financial management systems like accounting software and procurement software: financial analysis applications like reporting, consolidation and...
AXIL vs CODA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $7.3M |
| Net Profit | $704.9K | $1.0M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 67.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 14.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | 43.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.2% | 214.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $704.9K | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3K | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-245.6K | $908.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.7K | $913.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $633.7K | $326.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-109.8K | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5K | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.1K | $629.9K |
| Q4 25 | 68.1% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.6% | 68.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.0% | 64.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.7% | 65.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.1% | 65.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.0% | 73.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.5% | 70.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.5% | 69.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 14.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $28.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $138.3K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.1M | $58.1M |
| Total Assets | $16.2M | $64.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $26.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $22.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $23.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $25.0M |
| Q4 25 | $138.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $58.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $55.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $53.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $52.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $51.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $50.1M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $64.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $56.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $57.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $53.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $934.8K | $2.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $906.4K | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.1% | 34.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.33× | 2.83× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $6.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $934.8K | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-739.2K | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.4K | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-169.9K | $641.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.3K | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-336.6K | $-955.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-912.8K | $-298.0K |
| Q4 25 | $906.4K | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-747.6K | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-258.2K | $513.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | $941.1K | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-394.9K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-922.1K | $-433.6K |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.1% | -20.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.3% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.33× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.21× | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.29× | 0.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.59× | 6.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.80× | -0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.17× | -0.47× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXIL
| Hearing Enhancement And Protection | $7.8M | 95% |
| Other | $378.9K | 5% |
CODA
| Segment Reporting | $3.1M | 42% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 24% |
| Precision Acoustics Limited | $1.3M | 18% |
| Other | $1.1M | 15% |
