vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axil Brands, Inc. (AXIL) and SR Bancorp, Inc. (SRBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SR Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.4M vs $8.1M, roughly 1.0× Axil Brands, Inc.). SR Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs 8.7%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SR Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.4% vs 5.2%). SR Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.1M vs $906.4K). Over the past eight quarters, Axil Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Axil Brands, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered company that designs, manufactures and markets premium hearing protection products, audio enhancement devices and personal audio accessories. Its offerings include custom-fit earplugs, Bluetooth-enabled hearing buds for work, sports and leisure use, serving both consumer and professional segments across global markets.
SR Bancorp Inc. is a regional bank holding company based in the United States. It offers a full range of consumer and commercial banking services including deposit products, personal loans, mortgage lending, small business financing, and commercial credit solutions, primarily serving local communities and small to mid-sized enterprises in its operating areas.
AXIL vs SRBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $8.4M |
| Net Profit | $704.9K | $834.0K |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 13.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | 6.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.2% | -18.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | $8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $704.9K | $834.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3K | $693.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-245.6K | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.7K | $537.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $633.7K | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-109.8K | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.1K | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | 68.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | -38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 12.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $8.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $81.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $138.3K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.1M | $188.5M |
| Total Assets | $16.2M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $62.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $53.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $138.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $188.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $191.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $193.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $195.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $200.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $199.3M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $934.8K | $3.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $906.4K | $3.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.1% | 37.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.33× | 4.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $11.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $934.8K | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-739.2K | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.4K | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-169.9K | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.3K | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-336.6K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-912.8K | $-3.9M |
| Q4 25 | $906.4K | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-747.6K | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-258.2K | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $941.1K | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-394.9K | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-922.1K | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | 32.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | -19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.1% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.3% | -45.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.33× | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.21× | 1.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.29× | 4.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.59× | -1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.17× | -3.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXIL
| Hearing Enhancement And Protection | $7.8M | 95% |
| Other | $378.9K | 5% |
SRBK
Segment breakdown not available.
