vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axil Brands, Inc. (AXIL) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Velo3D, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.4M vs $8.1M, roughly 1.2× Axil Brands, Inc.). Axil Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -231.9%, a 240.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Axil Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -25.2%). Axil Brands, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($906.4K vs $-8.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Axil Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Axil Brands, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered company that designs, manufactures and markets premium hearing protection products, audio enhancement devices and personal audio accessories. Its offerings include custom-fit earplugs, Bluetooth-enabled hearing buds for work, sports and leisure use, serving both consumer and professional segments across global markets.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
AXIL vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $704.9K | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.2% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $704.9K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3K | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-245.6K | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.7K | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $633.7K | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-109.8K | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5K | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.1K | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 68.1% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.1% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.0% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.5% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.5% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $138.3K | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.1M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $16.2M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $138.3K | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2K | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.2K | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.3K | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.3K | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.6K | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.02× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $934.8K | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $906.4K | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.1% | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $934.8K | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-739.2K | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.4K | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-169.9K | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.3K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-336.6K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-912.8K | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | $906.4K | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-747.6K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-258.2K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $941.1K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-394.9K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-922.1K | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.1% | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.3% | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.80× | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXIL
| Hearing Enhancement And Protection | $7.8M | 95% |
| Other | $378.9K | 5% |
VELO
Segment breakdown not available.
