vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axil Brands, Inc. (AXIL) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Venus Concept Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.8M vs $8.1M, roughly 1.7× Axil Brands, Inc.). Axil Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -163.8%, a 172.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Axil Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -8.2%). Axil Brands, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($906.4K vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Axil Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Axil Brands, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered company that designs, manufactures and markets premium hearing protection products, audio enhancement devices and personal audio accessories. Its offerings include custom-fit earplugs, Bluetooth-enabled hearing buds for work, sports and leisure use, serving both consumer and professional segments across global markets.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
AXIL vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $704.9K | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.2% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 11.2% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.5M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $704.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.3K | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-245.6K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.7K | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $633.7K | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-109.8K | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.5K | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.1K | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 68.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.6% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.0% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 71.7% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.1% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.0% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.5% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.5% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.9% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.04 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.07 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.08 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $138.3K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.1M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $16.2M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $138.3K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.2K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $144.3K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.7M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $934.8K | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $906.4K | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.1% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.3% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.33× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $934.8K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-739.2K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.4K | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-169.9K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.3K | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-336.6K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-912.8K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $906.4K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-747.6K | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-258.2K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $941.1K | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-394.9K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-922.1K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.9% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.1% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.3% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.17× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXIL
| Hearing Enhancement And Protection | $7.8M | 95% |
| Other | $378.9K | 5% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
