vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axon Enterprise (AXON) and Generac (GNRC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Generac is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $796.7M, roughly 1.4× Axon Enterprise). Axon Enterprise runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -2.2%, a 2.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Axon Enterprise posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.9% vs -11.6%). Axon Enterprise produced more free cash flow last quarter ($155.4M vs $129.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Axon Enterprise's revenue compounded faster (31.5% CAGR vs 10.8%).
Axon Enterprise, Inc. is an American company based in Scottsdale, Arizona, that develops weapons and technology products for military, law enforcement, and civilians.
Generac Holdings Inc., commonly referred to as Generac, is a Fortune 1000 American manufacturer of backup power generation products for residential, light commercial, and industrial markets. Generac's power systems range in output from 800 watts to 9 megawatts and are available through independent dealers, retailers, and wholesalers. Generac has headquarters in Waukesha, Wisconsin, and manufacturing facilities in Berlin, Oshkosh, Jefferson, Eagle, and Whitewater, all in Wisconsin.
AXON vs GNRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $796.7M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $2.7M | $-24.5M |
| Gross Margin | 57.9% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.3% | -0.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 38.9% | -11.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -98.0% | -120.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $-0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $796.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $710.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $668.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $603.6M | $942.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $544.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $504.1M | $998.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $460.7M | $889.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.1M | $74.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $88.0M | $43.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.0M | $117.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.0M | $113.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.8M | $59.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $133.2M | $26.2M |
| Q4 25 | 57.9% | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.1% | 38.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.4% | 39.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 60.5% | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.8% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.3% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.4% | 35.6% |
| Q4 25 | -6.3% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.9% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.44 | $1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | $0.73 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.68 | $2.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.86 | $1.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.53 | $0.97 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.73 | $0.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.7B | $341.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.2B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $7.0B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.56× | 0.48× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $341.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $300.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $223.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $187.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $788.1M | $281.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $214.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $968.9M | $218.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $964.1M | $249.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | $5.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.56× | 0.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.66× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.79× | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $217.2M | $189.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $155.4M | $129.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.5% | 11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 7.8% | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 79.14× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $75.1M | $268.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $217.2M | $189.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.0M | $118.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-91.7M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.8M | $58.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $250.2M | $339.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.3M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.8M | $77.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.9M | $111.9M |
| Q4 25 | $155.4M | $129.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-114.7M | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $932.0K | $27.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.4M | $286.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.8M | $183.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $71.4M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.1M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | 19.5% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.3% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 9.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 79.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.54× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.84× | 2.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.03× | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.12× | 4.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXON
| Software And Sensors Segment | $342.5M | 43% |
| TASER Devices Professional | $264.2M | 33% |
| Personal Sensors | $109.1M | 14% |
| Platform Solutions | $80.9M | 10% |
GNRC
| Residential Power Products | $550.1M | 50% |
| Commercial And Industrial Power Products | $228.4M | 21% |
| Other | $202.3M | 19% |
| Other Products And Services | $106.0M | 10% |
| Intersegment Sales | $4.8M | 0% |
