vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Express (AXP) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $18.9M, roughly 1.4× American Express). American Express runs the higher net margin — 15.7% vs -112.0%, a 127.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Hyperscale Data, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.4% vs 11.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-16.3% CAGR vs -95.6%).
American Express Company, together with its subsidiaries, provides charge and credit payment card products, and travel-related services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Global Consumer Services Group, Global Commercial Services, and Global Merchant and Network Services. Its products and services include payment and financing products; network services; accounts payable expense management products and services; and travel and lifestyle services. The company's products an...
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
AXP vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.9M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $3.0M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | 15.7% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.4% | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.0% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4B | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | $17.8M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $-33.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.2% | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.7% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.4% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.6% | -151.4% |
| Q1 26 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.5% | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.8% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | -190.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.14 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.08 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.64 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.04 | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.49 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.15 | $-37.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $60.4M | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $34.0M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $308.9M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.78× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $742.0M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.0M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $221.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.0M | $9.6M |
| Q1 26 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.4B | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.8B | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.2B | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.2B | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7B | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5B | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.5B | $106.8M |
| Q1 26 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.5B | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4B | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2B | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3B | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7B | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.5B | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | $308.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $300.1B | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.6B | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.6B | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.2B | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $271.5B | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.0B | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.2B | $270.8M |
| Q1 26 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.78× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.80× | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.80× | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.74× | 4.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8B | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $-3.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3B | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $-5.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.0% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | -33.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXP
| Discount revenue | $9.5M | 50% |
| Other | $8.9M | 47% |
| Deposits with banks and other | $512.0K | 3% |
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |