vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Express (AXP) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Express is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.9M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.4× Venus Concept Inc.). American Express runs the higher net margin — 15.7% vs -163.8%, a 179.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Express posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Venus Concept Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-12.8% CAGR vs -95.6%).
American Express Company, together with its subsidiaries, provides charge and credit payment card products, and travel-related services worldwide. The company operates through three segments: Global Consumer Services Group, Global Commercial Services, and Global Merchant and Network Services. Its products and services include payment and financing products; network services; accounts payable expense management products and services; and travel and lifestyle services. The company's products an...
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
AXP vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.9M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $3.0M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | 15.7% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.4% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.0% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4B | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6B | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0B | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | $16.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $-20.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.7% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.4% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.6% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.6% | -33.7% |
| Q1 26 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.9% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.8% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.8% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | -120.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.14 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.08 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.64 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.04 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.49 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.15 | $-30.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $60.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $34.0M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $308.9M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.78× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $742.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $197.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $261.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $221.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $120.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.0M | $5.7M |
| Q1 26 | $60.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.4B | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2B | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.3B | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.7B | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.5B | $3.7M |
| Q1 26 | $308.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $300.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.6B | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.6B | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $282.2B | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $271.5B | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $271.0B | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.2B | $79.8M |
| Q1 26 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.64× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8B | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $-1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.3B | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $-1.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.0% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.1% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.3% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.4% | -8.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.84× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.72× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXP
| Discount revenue | $9.5M | 50% |
| Other | $8.9M | 47% |
| Deposits with banks and other | $512.0K | 3% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
