vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMREP CORP. (AXR) and PURE CYCLE CORP (PCYO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMREP CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $9.1M, roughly 1.6× PURE CYCLE CORP). PURE CYCLE CORP runs the higher net margin — 50.0% vs 21.6%, a 28.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMREP CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (93.8% vs 58.8%). Over the past eight quarters, PURE CYCLE CORP's revenue compounded faster (69.0% CAGR vs -13.6%).
AMREP Corporation is a real estate and media services company based in Princeton, New Jersey, in the United States. It was founded in 1961 as The American Realty and Petroleum Corporation.
Pure Cycles, is a bicycle company based in Los Angeles, California that was founded by Michael Fishman, Jordan Schau, Zachary Schau and Austin Stoffers in 2010, as Pure Fix Cycles.
AXR vs PCYO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $9.1M |
| Net Profit | $3.1M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 68.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 48.0% |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | 50.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 93.8% | 58.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 338.9% | 16.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5M | $7.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $717.0K | $809.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 64.0% |
| Q1 26 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | 48.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.4% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -33.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 62.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 40.3% |
| Q1 26 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | 54.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | 52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 37.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.75 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.0M | $17.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.0K | $8.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $139.4M | $147.5M |
| Total Assets | $143.9M | $168.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.9M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.4M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $20.5M |
| Q1 26 | $21.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.0K | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0K | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0K | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0K | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.0K | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | $139.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.0M | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.7M | $142.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.0M | $136.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $134.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.1M | $133.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.2M | $129.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.0M | $123.2M |
| Q1 26 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.1M | $168.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.7M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.8M | $151.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.9M | $149.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.0M | $147.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.8M | $140.4M |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $-979.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | -0.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $20.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $-979.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-503.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-182.0K | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $892.0K |
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -45.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.54× | -0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.03× | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | -0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.51× | -1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.05× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.63× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.59× | 0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXR
Segment breakdown not available.
PCYO
| Construction | $6.5M | 71% |
| Water And Wastewater Resource Development Segment | $2.5M | 27% |
