vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ) and Digital Brands Group, Inc. (DBGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Digital Brands Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.0× A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP.). A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. runs the higher net margin — -90.4% vs -1283.8%, a 1193.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -25.1%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
AZ vs DBGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $1.6M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-20.6M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | -77.1% |
| Operating Margin | -265.9% | -1385.4% |
| Net Margin | -90.4% | -1283.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | -25.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | -283.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-20.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-683.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | 46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -35.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 45.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1385.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -265.9% | -201.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.9% | -88.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -381.4% | -106.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -230.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -167.0% | -112.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -272.1% | -67.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1283.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.4% | -208.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1085.4% | -94.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.1% | -111.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -250.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -224.7% | -145.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.4% | -103.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-81.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-104.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-23.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.2M | $1.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.3M | $8.8M |
| Total Assets | $81.9M | $44.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | $542.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $289.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.0K | $92.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-504.0K | $19.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-340.0K | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | $41.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $24.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-658.0K | $-541.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-541.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -47.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.