vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ) and Marwynn Holdings, Inc. (MWYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.5× A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP.). A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. runs the higher net margin — -90.4% vs -116.0%, a 25.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -13.3%).
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is a Canada-based investment holding company focused on acquiring, managing, and scaling middle-market businesses primarily across North America. Its core operating segments cover industrial products, consumer goods, and technology-enabled services, targeting sustainable long-term value creation for its stakeholders.
AZ vs MWYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $2.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-2.7M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 42.4% |
| Operating Margin | -265.9% | -115.8% |
| Net Margin | -90.4% | -116.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | -13.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | -11713.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $623.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $23.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | -265.9% | -115.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -381.4% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -167.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -272.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | -90.4% | -116.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1085.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -224.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.3M | $2.3M |
| Total Assets | $81.9M | $11.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $480 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | $71.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-504.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-340.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $-95.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-95.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-658.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZ
Segment breakdown not available.
MWYN
| Other | $1.3M | 57% |
| Revenue From Recyclable Ewaste Materials Sales | $1.0M | 43% |
