vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Marwynn Holdings, Inc. (MWYN) and Onfolio Holdings, Inc (ONFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3M vs $2.0M, roughly 1.2× Onfolio Holdings, Inc). Onfolio Holdings, Inc runs the higher net margin — -27.0% vs -116.0%, a 89.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Marwynn Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-13.3% vs -20.1%).
Marwynn Holdings, Inc. is a Canada-based investment holding company focused on acquiring, managing, and scaling middle-market businesses primarily across North America. Its core operating segments cover industrial products, consumer goods, and technology-enabled services, targeting sustainable long-term value creation for its stakeholders.
Onfolio Holdings Inc. acquires, manages and grows a diversified portfolio of small to medium-sized online businesses, including niche content sites, e-commerce stores, and SaaS tools. It operates primarily in North America and Western Europe, focusing on high-margin, sustainable digital assets with stable revenue streams.
MWYN vs ONFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3M | $2.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.7M | $-547.1K |
| Gross Margin | 42.4% | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | -115.8% | -59.1% |
| Net Margin | -116.0% | -27.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -13.3% | -20.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11713.9% | -69.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $623.7K | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-547.1K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | $-700.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-534.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.4K | $-806.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-323.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-335.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-629.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-477.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.4% | 64.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 60.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 63.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -59.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -115.8% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | -27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -43.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -35.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -116.0% | -25.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -36.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3M | $2.5M |
| Total Assets | $11.6M | $11.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $480 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $529.8K |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-95.1K | $-397.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-397.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-95.1K | $34.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-430.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-145.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-471.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-332.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-431.0K |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MWYN
| Other | $1.3M | 57% |
| Revenue From Recyclable Ewaste Materials Sales | $1.0M | 43% |
ONFO
| B Two B | $1.6M | 81% |
| B Two C | $243.0K | 12% |
| Other | $138.6K | 7% |
