vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ) and OLB GROUP, INC. (OLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLB GROUP, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.1× A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP.). OLB GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -83.7% vs -90.4%, a 6.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -35.2%).
OLB Group, Inc. is a global financial technology provider offering omnichannel payment processing solutions, e-commerce enablement tools, and digital banking services for small and medium-sized enterprises across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific markets. Its core segments include merchant services, crypto payment integration, and cloud-based business management platforms.
AZ vs OLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -265.9% | -83.7% |
| Net Margin | -90.4% | -83.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | -35.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | 67.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.48 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -265.9% | -49.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.9% | -74.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -381.4% | -36.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -166.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -167.0% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -272.1% | -74.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -82.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -83.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.4% | -50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1085.4% | -93.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.1% | -46.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -167.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -224.7% | -52.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.4% | -75.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -67.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-1.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.3M | $4.6M |
| Total Assets | $81.9M | $12.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $29.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $27.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $41.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.0K | $53.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-504.0K | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-340.0K | $8.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $-115.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $-155.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-658.0K | $-376.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $-785.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-424.7K |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZ
Segment breakdown not available.
OLB
| Transaction And Processing Fees | $1.7M | 94% |
| Other | $99.2K | 6% |
