vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ) and Symbotic Inc. (SYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Symbotic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($630.0M vs $1.5M, roughly 407.2× A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP.). Symbotic Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -90.4%, a 90.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Symbotic Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.4% vs -1.6%).
Symbotic Inc. is an American robotics warehouse automation company based in Wilmington, Massachusetts.
AZ vs SYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $630.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | -265.9% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | -90.4% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | 29.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | 174.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $630.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $618.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $592.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | $549.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $486.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $503.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $491.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $424.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -265.9% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.9% | -6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -381.4% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -167.0% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -272.1% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.4% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1085.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.1% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -224.7% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.2M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.3M | $663.8M |
| Total Assets | $81.9M | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | $777.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | $954.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $903.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $727.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.0K | $870.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $901.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $663.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.3M | $221.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $210.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-504.0K | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-340.0K | $418.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $417.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $191.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 73.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | $530.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | $-138.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-658.0K | $-99.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $21.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-120.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 73.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZ
Segment breakdown not available.
SYM
| Systems | $590.3M | 94% |
| Operation Services | $28.8M | 5% |
| Software Maintenance And Support | $10.9M | 2% |
| Revision Of Prior Period Change In Accounting Principle Adjustment | $2.9M | 0% |
| Related Party | $1.1M | 0% |