vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV) and Symbotic Inc. (SYM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Symbotic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($630.0M vs $881.5K, roughly 714.6× Serve Robotics Inc.). Symbotic Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -3888.1%, a 3888.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs 29.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Symbotic Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.9% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
Symbotic Inc. is an American robotics warehouse automation company based in Wilmington, Massachusetts.
SERV vs SYM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $881.5K | $630.0M |
| Net Profit | $-34.3M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | -757.3% | 21.2% |
| Operating Margin | -4572.1% | 1.0% |
| Net Margin | -3888.1% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 400.1% | 29.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -161.3% | 174.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.50 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $881.5K | $630.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $687.0K | $618.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $642.0K | $592.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.5K | $549.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $176.3K | $486.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.0K | $503.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $468.0K | $491.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.7K | $424.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-34.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.9M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | $-6.6M |
| Q4 25 | -757.3% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.4% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -445.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -333.4% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -371.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -70.3% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.8% | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | -4572.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5067.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3527.1% | -6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3406.6% | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7701.3% | -5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3804.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1828.2% | -5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -814.6% | -12.0% |
| Q4 25 | -3888.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4806.4% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3000.5% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7441.8% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3601.8% | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1931.2% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -954.7% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.23 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.20 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.2M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $350.7M | $663.8M |
| Total Assets | $367.8M | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.7M | $777.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.8M | $954.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.3M | $903.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.9M | $727.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | $870.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $901.4M |
| Q4 25 | $350.7M | $663.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $283.9M | $221.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.2M | $210.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.2M | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.7M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.2M | $197.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.5M | $418.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.8M | $417.1M |
| Q4 25 | $367.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $299.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $216.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $139.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.5M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2M | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-29.6M | $191.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-46.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -5234.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1872.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 73.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-117.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-29.6M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-25.2M | $530.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.0M | $-138.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | $269.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.3M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.5M | $-99.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.7M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $21.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-46.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-36.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-22.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.1M | $197.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.1M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.1M | $18.6M |
| Q4 25 | -5234.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5314.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3426.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2934.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6307.8% | 40.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4529.7% | -23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1396.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -431.1% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1872.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1649.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 940.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 785.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2755.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2070.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 169.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 73.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SERV
Segment breakdown not available.
SYM
| Systems | $590.3M | 94% |
| Operation Services | $28.8M | 5% |
| Software Maintenance And Support | $10.9M | 2% |
| Revision Of Prior Period Change In Accounting Principle Adjustment | $2.9M | 0% |
| Related Party | $1.1M | 0% |
