vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and LendingClub Corp (LC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LendingClub Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($252.3M vs $148.6M, roughly 1.7× Azenta, Inc.). LendingClub Corp runs the higher net margin — 20.5% vs -10.4%, a 30.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingClub Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.9% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LendingClub Corp's revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.
LendingClub Corporation is an American financial services company headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was the first peer-to-peer lender to register its offerings as securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to offer loan trading on a secondary market. At its height, LendingClub was the world's largest peer-to-peer lending platform. The company reported that $15.98 billion in loans had been originated through its platform up to December 31, 2015.
AZTA vs LC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.6M | $252.3M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | $51.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -10.4% | 20.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 15.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.7% | 341.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $266.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.9M | $248.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $217.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.6M | $201.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.3M | $187.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.0M | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $14.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 10.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.25 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.6M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $11.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $10.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $9.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-770.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $-713.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $-339.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $-2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | $-669.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $-932.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $-791.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $-803.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $-352.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $-2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $-682.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-945.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | -1076.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | -297.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | -323.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | -161.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | -1237.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | -338.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | -504.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 52.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | -17.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -46.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -62.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZTA
| Multiomics | $67.2M | 45% |
| Core Products | $47.6M | 32% |
| Sample Repository Solutions | $33.8M | 23% |
LC
Segment breakdown not available.
