vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd (OSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($242.1M vs $148.6M, roughly 1.6× Azenta, Inc.). ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -10.4%, a 15.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 0.8%). ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.9M vs $14.7M). Over the past eight quarters, ONESPAWORLD HOLDINGS Ltd's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.
AZTA vs OSW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.6M | $242.1M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | $12.1M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 6.8% |
| Net Margin | -10.4% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.7% | -16.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | $258.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.9M | $240.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $219.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $217.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.6M | $241.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.3M | $224.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.4M | $211.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $15.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-137.4M | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | 42.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.1% | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.8% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.25 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.48 | $0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.6M | $16.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $84.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $542.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $707.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $336.6M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | $57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.0M | $48.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.5M | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $353.5M | $65.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $85.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $96.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $98.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $138.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $542.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $552.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $548.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $530.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $554.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $532.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $515.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $707.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $732.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $731.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $708.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $746.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $734.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $756.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $763.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.27× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.8M | $20.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.7M | $14.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.9% | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.9M | $68.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $16.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $17.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | $13.7M |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZTA
| Multiomics | $67.2M | 45% |
| Core Products | $47.6M | 32% |
| Sample Repository Solutions | $33.8M | 23% |
OSW
| Services | $197.3M | 82% |
| Products | $44.8M | 18% |
