vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($253.4M vs $148.6M, roughly 1.7× Azenta, Inc.). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs 0.8%). Palomar Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($409.0M vs $14.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
AZTA vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.6M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | -10.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.9M | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.6M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.3M | $131.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.4M | $118.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.0M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-137.4M | $26.4M |
| Q4 25 | 42.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.1% | 29.0% |
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.8% | 22.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.25 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.48 | $1.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.6M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $336.6M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.6M | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.0M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.5M | $47.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $353.5M | $61.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $532.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $501.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.8M | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.7M | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.9% | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.9M | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7M | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZTA
| Multiomics | $67.2M | 45% |
| Core Products | $47.6M | 32% |
| Sample Repository Solutions | $33.8M | 23% |
PLMR
Segment breakdown not available.