vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH) and Vulcan Materials Company (VMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.4× Vulcan Materials Company). Vulcan Materials Company runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 7.6%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vulcan Materials Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -10.2%). Vulcan Materials Company produced more free cash flow last quarter ($358.2M vs $248.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Vulcan Materials Company's revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is the parent of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., an American company specializing in digital transformation and artificial intelligence. The company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, in the Washington metropolitan area, with 80 additional offices around the globe. Booz Allen's stated core business is to provide consulting, analysis, and engineering services to public- and private-sector organizations and nonprofits.
Vulcan Materials Company is an American company based in Birmingham, Alabama. It is principally engaged in the production, distribution and sale of construction materials. Vulcan is the largest producer of construction materials, primarily gravel, crushed stone, and sand, and employs approximately 12,000 people at over 400 facilities. Vulcan serves 22 states, the District of Columbia, Mexico, Canada, Bahamas and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
BAH vs VMC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.6B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $200.0M | $252.0M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 25.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 19.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.2% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.0% | -14.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $1.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $252.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.0M | $374.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.0M | $320.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.7M | $128.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.9M | $293.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.1M | $207.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.2M | $308.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $102.7M |
| Q4 25 | 51.9% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.6% | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.2% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.7% | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.4% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | 19.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 11.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 6.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.63 | $1.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $2.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.16 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.97 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.45 | $2.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.01 | $1.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $2.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.97 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $882.0M | $183.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | $4.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $8.5B |
| Total Assets | $7.1B | $16.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.84× | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $882.0M | $183.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $816.0M | $191.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $711.0M | $347.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $885.0M | $181.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $559.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.7M | $433.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.7M | $111.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $554.3M | $292.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $996.0M | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $7.5B |
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $16.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $17.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $13.9B |
| Q4 25 | 3.84× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.98× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.74× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.99× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.79× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.83× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.14× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.26× | 0.44× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $261.0M | $543.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $248.0M | $358.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 18.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 9.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | 2.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $933.4M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | $543.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.0M | $676.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.0M | $341.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.0M | $251.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.8M | $440.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $587.1M | $595.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $201.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.8M | $173.4M |
| Q4 25 | $248.0M | $358.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.0M | $454.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $238.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.4M | $83.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | $277.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.3M | $498.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.6M | $20.6M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | 0.65× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 1.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAH
| Defense Clients | $1.5B | 55% |
| Civil Clients | $732.0M | 28% |
| Intelligence Clients | $434.0M | 17% |
VMC
| Revenue Excluding Freight Delivery | $1.7B | 87% |
| Concrete | $79.6M | 4% |
| Services | $76.3M | 4% |
| Asphalt | $59.9M | 3% |
