vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ball Corporation (BALL) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ball Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.3B vs $93.7M, roughly 35.7× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Ball Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.2% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 7.9%).
Ball Corporation is a leading global provider of innovative, sustainable aluminum packaging solutions for beverage, personal care, and household product brands. It also operates an aerospace segment that delivers advanced technologies, systems, and services to government and commercial customers worldwide, prioritizing environmental responsibility and product reliability across all operations.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
BALL vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.3B | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $200.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 16.2% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 766.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.73 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.0M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.0M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.7% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.5% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.5% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 128.3% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.73 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.76 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.63 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.23 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.65 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.61 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.0B | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.4B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $19.5B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.29× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.0M | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.0M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.0M | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.0M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5B | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1B | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.5B | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3B | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $19.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.9B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 1.29× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.26× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.24× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.12× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.80× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.80× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.76× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.2B | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.0B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 31.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.05× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $788.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $384.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-665.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $500.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $610.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2B | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $257.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $236.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-746.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $393.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $493.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -48.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.07× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.34× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BALL
| Transferred Over Time | $2.7B | 82% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $602.0M | 18% |
PACK
Segment breakdown not available.
