vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CF Industries (CF) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CF Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $93.7M, roughly 20.0× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, CF Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.8% vs 2.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs 12.8%).
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and distributor of agricultural fertilizers, including ammonia, urea, and ammonium nitrate products. The company is based in Northbrook, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, and was founded in 1946 as the Central Farmers Fertilizer Company. For its first 56 years, it was a federation of regional agricultural supply cooperatives. CF then demutualized, and became a publicly traded company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
CF vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $495.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.0% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 26.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 22.8% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.56 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | $495.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $460.0M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.0M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.0M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $506.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $238.0M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.9% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.4% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.4% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.8% | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 33.0% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.6% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.6% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.1% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.2% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.56 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.19 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.37 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.85 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.55 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.30 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.03 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $14.1B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.66× | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.8B | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $14.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.9B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | 0.66× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.62× | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.60× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.57× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.55× | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $539.0M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $313.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.8B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $539.0M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $563.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $586.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $420.0M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $931.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $445.0M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $313.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $717.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $391.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $347.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.94× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CF
| Ammonia | $591.0M | 32% |
| UAN | $493.0M | 26% |
| Urea | $372.0M | 20% |
| Other | $244.0M | 13% |
| Other Products | $147.0M | 8% |
| Ammonium Nitrate Segment | $25.0M | 1% |
PACK
Segment breakdown not available.
