vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.4× Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.). Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 56.7% vs 8.7%, a 48.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is a Canadian-American alternative asset manager. The company was founded in December 2022 as a spin-off of the asset management operations of Brookfield Corporation, and manages investments across real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, private equity, and credit markets globally.

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

BAM vs EAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EAT
EAT
1.4× larger
EAT
$1.5B
$1.1B
BAM
Higher net margin
BAM
BAM
48.0% more per $
BAM
56.7%
8.7%
EAT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Revenue
$1.1B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$615.0M
$127.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
84.2%
11.3%
Net Margin
56.7%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$2.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$974.0M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$931.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$954.0M
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$873.0M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$821.0M
$1.2B
Net Profit
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$615.0M
$128.5M
Q3 25
$692.0M
$99.5M
Q2 25
$584.0M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$507.0M
$119.1M
Q4 24
$118.5M
Q3 24
$537.0M
$38.5M
Q2 24
$124.0M
$57.3M
Operating Margin
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
11.3%
Q4 25
84.2%
11.6%
Q3 25
79.1%
8.7%
Q2 25
70.8%
9.8%
Q1 25
61.0%
11.0%
Q4 24
11.5%
Q3 24
72.5%
5.0%
Q2 24
80.4%
6.1%
Net Margin
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
8.7%
Q4 25
56.7%
8.8%
Q3 25
71.0%
7.4%
Q2 25
62.7%
7.3%
Q1 25
53.1%
8.4%
Q4 24
8.7%
Q3 24
61.5%
3.4%
Q2 24
15.1%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$2.86
Q3 25
$2.17
Q2 25
$2.31
Q1 25
$2.56
Q4 24
$2.61
Q3 24
$0.84
Q2 24
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.6B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$424.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$8.9B
$406.0M
Total Assets
$17.0B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$1.6B
$15.0M
Q3 25
$1.1B
$33.6M
Q2 25
$480.0M
$18.9M
Q1 25
$332.0M
$17.5M
Q4 24
$14.8M
Q3 24
$16.2M
Q2 24
$10.0M
$64.6M
Total Debt
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$451.3M
Q3 25
$525.8M
Q2 25
$426.0M
Q1 25
$518.3M
Q4 24
$652.0M
Q3 24
$806.9M
Q2 24
$786.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$8.9B
$379.3M
Q3 25
$8.5B
$343.9M
Q2 25
$8.5B
$370.9M
Q1 25
$8.5B
$259.0M
Q4 24
$131.5M
Q3 24
$9.0B
$12.7M
Q2 24
$3.2B
$39.4M
Total Assets
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$17.0B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$16.5B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$16.1B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$15.0B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.5B
Q2 24
$4.2B
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
1.05×
Q4 25
1.19×
Q3 25
1.53×
Q2 25
1.15×
Q1 25
2.00×
Q4 24
4.96×
Q3 24
63.54×
Q2 24
19.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$562.0M
$571.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.91×
4.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$562.0M
$218.9M
Q3 25
$745.0M
$120.8M
Q2 25
$529.0M
$186.0M
Q1 25
$265.0M
$212.0M
Q4 24
$218.2M
Q3 24
$567.0M
$62.8M
Q2 24
$159.0M
$141.5M
Free Cash Flow
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$155.2M
Q3 25
$62.2M
Q2 25
$106.1M
Q1 25
$132.4M
Q4 24
$168.9M
Q3 24
$6.3M
Q2 24
$83.5M
FCF Margin
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
10.7%
Q3 25
4.6%
Q2 25
7.3%
Q1 25
9.3%
Q4 24
12.4%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
6.9%
Capex Intensity
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.4%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
5.5%
Q1 25
5.6%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
5.0%
Q2 24
4.8%
Cash Conversion
BAM
BAM
EAT
EAT
Q1 26
4.47×
Q4 25
0.91×
1.70×
Q3 25
1.08×
1.21×
Q2 25
0.91×
1.74×
Q1 25
0.52×
1.78×
Q4 24
1.84×
Q3 24
1.06×
1.63×
Q2 24
1.28×
2.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BAM
BAM

Incentive Fees$452.0M42%
Infrastruture$332.0M31%
Private Equity$174.0M16%
Renewable Power And Transition$66.0M6%
Other$47.0M4%
Management And Advisory Fees$14.0M1%

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

Related Comparisons