vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and North American Construction Group Ltd. (NOA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $860.2M, roughly 1.3× North American Construction Group Ltd.). Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 56.7% vs 4.7%, a 52.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is a Canadian-American alternative asset manager. The company was founded in December 2022 as a spin-off of the asset management operations of Brookfield Corporation, and manages investments across real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, private equity, and credit markets globally.
Shanghai Construction (Group) Corporation (SCG) is a Chinese construction and engineering company, ranked as the 16th largest construction company in the world based on 2011 revenues.
BAM vs NOA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $860.2M |
| Net Profit | $615.0M | $40.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | 84.2% | 15.4% |
| Net Margin | 56.7% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $974.0M | $860.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $931.0M | $573.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $873.0M | $636.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $821.0M | $439.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $786.0M | $244.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $970.0M |
| Q4 25 | $615.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.0M | $40.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $584.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $537.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.0M | $34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-26.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 84.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -2.0% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -2.7% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $17.0B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $17.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $585.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $562.0M | $140.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.91× | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $562.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $745.0M | $140.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $529.0M | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $109.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $516.0M | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.52× | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.38× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAM
| Incentive Fees | $452.0M | 42% |
| Infrastruture | $332.0M | 31% |
| Private Equity | $174.0M | 16% |
| Renewable Power And Transition | $66.0M | 6% |
| Other | $47.0M | 4% |
| Management And Advisory Fees | $14.0M | 1% |
NOA
Segment breakdown not available.
