vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (BANC) and NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. (NUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.6M vs $286.9M, roughly 1.1× BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.). BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. runs the higher net margin — 25.1% vs 0.6%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs -12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, NU SKIN ENTERPRISES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-14.5% CAGR vs -23.7%).
BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.BANCEarnings & Financial Report
Banc of California is an American bank with 80 branches in California, as well as locations in Denver, Colorado, and Durham, North Carolina. The bank is headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with about 2,000 employees nationwide including in New York and Chicago. Banc of California offers a broad range of loan and deposit products and services, focusing on providing banking and treasury management services to small-, middle-market, and venture-backed businesses.
Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. is an American multilevel marketing company that develops and sells personal care products and dietary and nutritional supplements. Under the Nu Skin and Pharmanex brands, the company sells its products in 54 markets through a network of approximately 1.2 million independent distributors.
BANC vs NUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $286.9M | $320.6M |
| Net Profit | $72.0M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 66.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.4% |
| Net Margin | 25.1% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | -12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $286.9M | $320.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.5M | $370.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $364.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.1M | $386.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.3M | $364.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $445.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.4M | $430.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $492.4M | $439.1M |
| Q1 26 | $72.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $77.4M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.6M | $107.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.9M | $-36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | $-118.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 66.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 70.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | -28.6% |
| Q1 26 | 25.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | -8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | -26.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.39 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $2.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-2.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.2B | $198.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $223.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $794.1M |
| Total Assets | $34.7B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $198.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $239.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $253.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $265.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $213.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $232.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $223.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $794.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $805.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $799.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $787.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $754.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $651.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $706.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $686.2M |
| Q1 26 | $34.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.2B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
