vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (BANC) and PRECISION DRILLING Corp (PDS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PRECISION DRILLING Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($299.5M vs $286.9M, roughly 1.0× BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.).
BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.BANCEarnings & Financial Report
Banc of California is an American bank with 80 branches in California, as well as locations in Denver, Colorado, and Durham, North Carolina. The bank is headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with about 2,000 employees nationwide including in New York and Chicago. Banc of California offers a broad range of loan and deposit products and services, focusing on providing banking and treasury management services to small-, middle-market, and venture-backed businesses.
Precision Drilling Corporation is the largest drilling rig contractor in Canada, also providing oil field rental and supplies.
BANC vs PDS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $286.9M | $299.5M |
| Net Profit | $72.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 25.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $286.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.5M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $492.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $77.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | — |
| Total Assets | $34.7B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | $34.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
